Home | About Indlaw | Advertise | Sitemap | Feedback | Contact Us
 

Support | Info? | Renew
NEWS BY SUBJECT

Tax Laws
Corporate Laws
Trade Laws
Criminal Laws
Consumer Protection
Supreme Court
Intellectual Property
Banking Laws
Environment Law
Media & Entertainment
Advocates & Judges
STATE NEWS

New Delhi
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
West Bengal
Gujarat
Punjab
  MORE
INTERNATIONAL NEWS

Legal News
Immigration law
Tax News
Technology law
Regulatory Issues
Company & Finance
Policy
Banking News
International Law
Online Legal Issues
Trade & Business
Law & Development
INDLAW UPDATES
Judgments
Legislations & Rules
Notifications & Circulars
Practice Direct.& Forms
Reports
By Industry Wise
By Policy Groups
INDLAW RESOURCES


Newsletters
Practice Tech
Court Lists
Court Calendar
Directories
Professional Store
FAQs on Laws
Education Center
Budget
Exim Policy
Credit Policy

 

 
Search News Advance Search

CBI probe ordered in communal riot case

27th September, 2006

The Allahabad High Court has directed a CBI inquiry in a matter relating to communal riots, that took place in Mau district of Uttar Pradesh last year.

Justice Barkat Ali Zaidi observed it is not possible to expect a fair and impartial probe by the present prosecuting agency and it is necessary in the end of justice that the matter be entrusted to a more responsible and independent investigating agency.

The court has asked the CBI director to submit a progress report to the court within 60 days and has fixed December 4 as the date for further hearing.

The order has been passed on a writ petition filed by Farzana Khatoon and her husband Mohd Muslim of Mau.

As per allegations made in the application on October 15, 2005, the rioters entered the house of the applicant, beat them and raped Farzana and her daughter. Thereafter, the rioters looted valuables in the house before fleeing.

The applicants claimed they have been making efforts to get their statements recorded under section 164 CrPC by the chief juidicial magistrate, Mau but the investigating officer did not turn up and magistrate did not record their statement.

By a March 30, 2006 order, the HC had directed the Mau SSP to transfer the probe to any other police station instead of police station Kotwali, Mau and for getting her statement recorded under section 164 CrPC.

It is alleged that inspite of the HC order, the investigating authorities did not take any step to get the statement recorded.

The court also directed the police to take steps for the protection of two applicants and their family members in Mau.

(UNI)


Copyright © 2006 Indlaw Communications Pvt. Limited. (ICPL).
All rights reserved.
ICPL shall not be liable for the adequacy of the information, any mistakes, in accuracies or improper display of content and for any actions taken in reliance there on.


Related News

Indlaw Channels

Arbitration
Articles & Reviews
Banking Law
Community
Company Law Online
Consumer Protection
Crimes

Employment Law
Human Rights
Incometax
Indlaw
India Laws
Indirect Tax
News
Indlaw.net
Intellectual Property
SC Judgments
Sales tax
Students & Education
TradeLaw Online